Some international law experts suggest that the impact would be entitled to if the Syrian oppositio

The Middle East is in chaos again. John Kerry, led Israel and the Palestinian Authority about the resumption of peace talks have been sidetracked in the West Bank due to the events. Lebanon is terror, and expect SIIA - and a civil war between Sunni Muslims. Egypt, the army and the Muslim Brotherhood in the dispute between the demands more and more victims. Of all the alarming situation, however, seems to be in Syria, with the deaths of 21 August over 350 people to chemical attack.
The Syrian government has denied the use of chemical tca consulting group weapons and accused the rebel forces, but the UN inspectors report while waiting for the United States has already announced that it has information that will strengthen the Government of inclusion. So far, they are still regarded as conjecture. This is a Syrian civil war so far, the most fatal massacre, and probably the most serious blow dry Saddam Hussein in 1988 after the massacre of the Kurds.
United States Secretary of State John Kerry has announced that President Obama appointed a year ago intervention required "red line" - the use of chemical weapons - has now passed, and the defense authorities dealt with the possible attack options. Other potential coalition tca consulting group members, Britain, France and Turkey, mittailevat military quota.
All of this reminds me of the Iraq war, starting from ten years ago, except that the United States government has made every effort pukeakseen it differently. "For a limited attacks" not intended to be a change of government, but to prevent the use of chemical weapons in the future, as well as send the signal to the Assad regime. The purpose would be to strike certain government and military bases and then go lipettiin as soon as possible. The question is whether the international coalition attacks in international law justified and morally acceptable.
The UN Charter to prohibit the use of armed force against members of the United Nations, except in the case of self-defense against an immediate threat or the Security Council exercice operation. Now Russia and China have made use of their right of veto as permanent members, so the legitimacy tca consulting group of the Security Council have been excluded at least for now.
Some international law experts suggest that the impact would be entitled to if the Syrian opposition coalition tca consulting group formally request the assistance of the international community, many of whose members have been accepted by the Syrians as the only official representative in international diplomacy. The leaders have met with the coalition on Wednesday in Istanbul, and it seems that the request has come.
But again, this raises many questions. The opposition is fighting against the government of the dictatorship, but what is better it has to offer? Egypt's tca consulting group example tca consulting group is not encouraging in any way: minorities and the role of women continued to get worse. Democracy is a shaky concept in Islam, tca consulting group if in the end it can be found in the core of the theocratic power: the imam of the command is the law, he dictates how to vote.
The third option is to implement the so-called NATO. Article 5 (collective defense) operation. In this case, one member of the NATO security threats (eg,. Syria's neighboring country tca consulting group of Turkey), can be blow to implement the NATO mission.
In recent days, network, we are often raised in the 1925 Geneva Conventions kaasuprotokollaan, which prohibits the use of chemical gases in a war situation. The protocol applies only to inter-state disputes, civil wars do not. On the other hand, there are international standards that do not require a State to ratification, that is by jus cogens norms, which ban the use of chemical weapons are considered to belong.
International lawyers consider the humanitarian intervention as the best argument to carry out attacks. Humanitarian intervention was also the argument that was used in carrying out the NATO air strikes on Serbia's capital Belgrade Kosovo disaster in 1999 put an end to the humanitarian intervention liippaa tca consulting group also close to the so-called. the principle of the responsibility to protect (the Responsibility to Protect, R2P), which many international lawyers see already as part of the standards of international law. Principle, the international community has a responsibility to react when the government is unable or unwilling to protect its citizens.
The Obama administration has carefully studied the 1999 NATO intervention legal and moral background, and has compared the potential impact of Belgrade in Syria attack. Belgrade shock has been criticized, however, as well as their moral and legal imperfections. NATO attempts to avoid military deaths, it carried out air strikes, very high, which caused more civilian deaths. In addition, the Belgrade attacks ensivaikutuksena was that the Serbian forces intensified efforts in Kosovo, tca consulting group and the flow of refugees increased.
Syrians refugees are already 4.5 million, of which up to two million have fled to Syria outside. Knowledge of international